On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
On Mi, 2012-01-18 at 16:55 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
> I've renamed my branch to concurrent-sync-sessions and rebased onto
> master. I'm now going through and making required changes to get tests
> to work.
Note that I pushed another change onto a new "signal-handling" branch.
This affects you because syncevo-dbus-server will have to relay
suspend/abort requests. The helper process will have to deal with
signals similar to syncevo-local-sync helper in that branch.
Do these changes make sense?
Yes, this looks fine.
btw, I noticed when looking through this the the copyright dates for
SuspendFlags.cpp are old.