On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:36 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote:
> It seems to me as if we've got 2 choices right now...
>
> 1) Postpone this and wait till we can bump the requirement to GLib >=
> 2.26 to do this work.
> 2) Go forward with this and use it when ./configure detects an
> adequate GLib version.
>
> I'm thinking the second option sounds like the way to go. Let me know
> your opinions on this.
I agree. It'll allow me to continue providing binaries for a wider
variety of Linux systems on
syncevolution.org and make distribution
packagers happy because they can ignore the in-tree copy of the Bluez
gdbus.
Ok, I'll branch a gio-gdbus branch off my dbus-server-reorg branch.
Cheers,
Chris