Re: [SyncEvolution] PBAP backend (bug 23776)
Hi Patrick,
To get started quickly, a new backend could derive from the
TrackingSyncSource and simply not implement any kind of change
tracking and writing. In terms of the TrackingSyncSource API that
means that the derived class provide a list of IDs without revision
strings and only implements the item read method.
Thanks for the info. I'm going to do some tests following your
suggestion, but I already have some questions:
1. Assuming this backend needs to have D-Bus communication to another
daemon (obex-client), how would it access the mainloop in order to have
pseudo-blocking calls?
2. For the non-supported backend functionality (particularly write
operations), what would be the proper thing to do? Just omit the calls?
Cheers,
Mikel