Re: [SyncEvolution] automated testing of ActiveSync

On 15/07/11 11:42, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Fr, 2011-07-15 at 11:21 +0100, Andy Gould wrote: >> On 11/07/11 17:20, Patrick Ohly wrote: > commit 6300b3ea9184e114b521ef2e5eafda476c836e5c > Author: Patrick Ohly&lt;patrick.ohly(a)intel.com&gt; > Date: Mon Jul 11 14:40:06 2011 +0200 > > SyncEvolution: fixed change tracking in testing > > When testing with "Client::Source::*::testChanges", two different > accounts must be used. Otherwise the two simulated SyncEvolution > clients share the same sync keys and testing fails. > > The solution is to switch to a different account, derived by appending > _B to the original account ID, for the second client. > ... > > --- a/syncevolution/ActiveSyncSourceRegister.cpp > +++ b/syncevolution/ActiveSyncSourceRegister.cpp > @@ -133,6 +133,17 @@ static TestingSyncSource *createEASSource(const ClientTestConfig::createsource_t > ClientTest&client, int source, bool isSourceA) > { > TestingSyncSource *res = create(client, source, isSourceA); > + > + // Mangle username: if the base username in the config is account > + // "foo", then source B uses "foo_B", because otherwise it'll end > + // up sharing change tracking with source A. > + if (!isSourceA) { > + ActiveSyncSource *eassource = static_cast<ActiveSyncSource *>(res); > + std::string account = eassource->getSyncConfig().getSyncUsername(); > + account += "_B"; > + eassource->getSyncConfig().setSyncUsername(account, true); > + } > + > > Where are you seeing the tests using the same activesyncd account when > they should be using different ones? > Hi Patrick, I may have misunderstood the point of the 2 activsyncd accounts ( Foo, and Foo_B in gconf) - can you clarify for me.... should they point to different Exchange accounts ( andy(a)cstylianou.com and andy_B(a)cstylianou.com) - or the same one?