On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 16:16 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
On 04/17/2012 04:40 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Ove, as maintainer of the Maemo port, can you perhaps create an account
> already before the migration? In that case bugs related to you could be
> assigned properly from the start. I'd also like to have you as default
> assignee for the "Maemo 5" component. Okay?
The new bug tracker at fdo is now ready. Kudos to Tollef Fog Heen for
File an issue:
Most, but not all, bugs from bugs.meego.com
were migrated. I already
closed the ones that were migrated, with links to the new one.
Unfortunately my initial data export missed the bugs in the
non-SyncEvolution component, so in particular the Maemo bugs were not
migrated. I hope to move those later.
> Do we need a separate "Harmattan" component or should
we use just a
> single "Maemo" component for all Maemo releases?
Depends. It may be best to have a separate component. As far as
SyncEvolution is concerned, Harmattan has very little in common with
Fremantle and earlier Maemo versions. The backends used are completely
different, and the Harmattan version still lacks e.g. DAV support and a
decent GUI (and when it gets one, it will probably look different from
the Fremantle one, since Fremantle is GTK-based, while Harmattan is
Qt-based, and several other differences).
There's now a "Maemo" and "Harmattan" component.
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.