Re: [SyncEvolution] Concurrent sync sessions update - Almost done
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:43 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
We've now got the GIO GDBus issues fixed and all the non-autosync
&
non-connection tests pass with both DBus wrappers. We are currently
going through the code and making sure code is commented properly,
debugging output is cleaned up and header files are organized more
cleanly.
Can you rebase it onto for-master/new-master or even
for-master/platform-modules?
I'm currently running a quick test and will bump master up to
for-master/new-master once that is done.
for-master/platform-modules is a bit more difficult because it includes
some code refactoring which affects the src/dbus/server sources. I
expect conflicts. I don't want to delay your work, but it's likely that
the for-master/platform-modules will go in first.
Perhaps you can have a look whether the changes in
for-master/platform-modules make sense while you are rebasing?
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.