On 22/12/10 21:41, Patrick Ohly wrote:
How strongly do you feel about the added description? I'd rather
the code as it is instead of risking breaking something for someone
(I posted a reply to this earlier, but it seems to have disappeared into
a cyber-black hole.)
The issue is not important enough to warrant turning everything upside
down, and maybe causing problems for other people.
I've made the changes to the xml file, as you suggested, and it's now
doing what I want. If I can do that in future versions, I'm OK.