On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:25 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Fr, 2011-09-02 at 09:56 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Is there any reason to refer to "peers" here instead of
"services"?
>
http://syncevolution.org/documentation/compatibility
Peers also includes things like mobile phones, services doesn't. That's
the main reason. Feel free to make this more readable.
That such peers work is not documented well (ehem, at all?) on the page,
though. There is only the Wiki pages side bar which lists pages tagged
appropriately.
And what does it mean by "indirectly" synchronizing data? Is that
something people are likely to be interested in?
--
murrayc(a)murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com