Re: [SyncEvolution] compiling activesyncd + SyncEvolution backend
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 10:00 +0300, Iovene, Salvatore wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Patrick Ohly
<patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
> On this occasion, can you review my "syncevolution-compilation" branch?
> On that branch I make it possible again to compile the backend as part
> of the SyncEvolution "configure + make" cycle.
I had a look. I resent the ENABLE_ACTIVESYNC name :) Can we name it
ENABLE_SYNCEVOLUTION_ACTIVESYNC_BACKEND? I know it's very long, but it
would satisfy both the case when we're compiling from activesyncd and
from syncevolution.
This won't work without further changes to make it compile in
SyncEvolution. Long-term the code is meant to live in SyncEvolution. Can
we please make it so that it works nicely there and consider compilation
in activesyncd a temporary hack, and thus accept the not so nice name
there?
Other than that, you forgot to change it in activesyncd/Makefile.am.
Which makes me wonder: have you actually tried if it compiles from
within activesyncd?
No. Sorry, I should have mentioned that explicitly.
Are you sure you can define EASSYNC_CFLAGS like that?
Nope, it has to be EASSYNC_CFLAGS="...."
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.