On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 10:52 +0100, Chris G wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 22:05 +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > While I'm about it running syncevo-phone-config.py was rather painful
> > because I had to accept hundreds of bluetooth connections to my phone
> > while syncevo-phone-config.py was running.
>
> I know exactly what you mean. My Sony Ericsson K750i had a joystick that
> was so worn out that I could no longer navigate to the "always accept"
> option. Eventually I managed to reach that point by brute force.
>
> Regarding running syncevo-phone-config.py: this is definitely not the
> recommended way to create a config. I bet it arrived at the same
> configuration that we already ship as template for S40 and S60 Nokia
> phones, so you could have chosen one of those instead.
>
It does seem to have got to something pretty similar, in fact I don't
think I see any difference between S40, S60 and my self-created E71.
There's one difference: "calendar" and "todo" are active, using
the same
URI, whereas "calendar+todo" is inactive. The right configuration would
have only "calandar+todo" as active.
Please fix this as follows:
syncevolution --configure --source-property sync=none \
<config> calendar todo
syncevolution --configure --source-property sync=two-way \
<config> calendar+todo
Then try again.
Yongsheng, as I don't have any device with a combined calendar + todo
store, can you try to reproduce and fix the issue? See
http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.