On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 10:11 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alberto Mardegan
> <alberto.mardegan(a)canonical.com> wrote:
> It's possible to inject an oauth token into UOA so that
> will use it. However, I'm not sure of how many dependencies
> are required
> to have this working in Ubuntu Server. The packages you
> definitely need are:
> You can try and see if the amount of dependencies brought in
> by these
> packages is acceptable. If it is, please let me know and I'll
> try to
> guide you further.
> It brings in a huge number (182), but most of them acceptable... but
> doing so it wants to uninstall syncevolution-activesync,
> syncevolution-activesync-saucy and syncevolution-bundle.
Are you on Ubuntu 14.4 LTS (aka Trusty)?
I've upgraded, yes, because syncevolution-provider-uoa wasn't in 13.10.
Ubuntu started using SyncEvolution for syncing in 14.4. What you are
seeing is probably the intentional conflict between the distro's
"syncevolution" package and syncevolution.org's
Normally, one can switch back and forth between these, but not if some
other components explicitly depend on "syncevolution". I'm not sure
whether I should allow syncevolution.org
packages to replace
"syncevolution" without uninstalling these other components, because
there is no guarantee that syncevolution.org
packages were compiled as
needed by the distro.
Actually, at the moment they aren't: syncevolution.org
packages do not
have UOA support, while the Ubuntu packages do.
I guess I will have to change this, because eventually Ubuntu users will
hopefully want to try out more recent versions of SyncEvolution.
Renato, what do you think?
I'm fine with switching to the ubuntu-provided ones. Should I do this?
On another tack, what is considered gsso in ubuntu? Is that 'signond'?