Re: [SyncEvolution] [REVIEW REQUEST 0/7] PBAP backend proposal
On Fr, 2012-01-27 at 18:00 +0000, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Fr, 2012-01-27 at 14:55 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> From: Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz(a)bmw-carit.de>
>
> This patch series implements a simple PBAP backend.
Impressive - I wasn't expecting results that quickly. You even had to go
in and improve the C++ D-Bus binding! ;-}
I'll add that improvement also to the non-GIO version of the bindings
and change your includes/compilers flags so that it works with both.
I've pushed your commits and my changes to the "pbap" branch in
meego.gitorious.org.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.