Re: [SyncEvolution] merging of winning and loosing items
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 13:11 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
On 09/04/2014 15:08:27, "Patrick Ohly"
<patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
>
>For example, CouchDB assumes that a DB gets created in one place and
>then gets replicated. You cannot take two independent DBs and merge
>them
>(at least as far as I know - I am not a CouchDB expert).
Couch does master-master replication.
Does that mean that master A can create DB 1, master B can create DB 2,
and then both DBs get merged into a common DB 3? That's what I meant.
I believe what you think of is that master A can have a copy of DB 1 and
master B can have another copy of the same DB, and that both copies can
be modified independently.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.