Re: [SyncEvolution] state of libsynthesis regarding syncevolution 1.4
On Mi, 2013-11-20 at 11:23 +0100, tino.keitel+syncevolution(a)tikei.de
wrote:
Hi Patrick,
what is the state of the current libsynthesis development? There is
already a libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 tag. Is it a
good idea to use that for upcoming syncevolution packages?
It is an *excellent* idea to use the libsynthesis that matches the
SyncEvolution release that you are packaging ;-)
The reason is that this is what I have tested together. It may also
contain API changes that SyncEvolution depends on or fixes for problems
reported by SyncEvolution users.
However, libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 has not been
released yet. Consider the tag experimental until the actual tar archive
gets published. In fact, the main reason why I haven't published
1.3.99.6 yet is a problem found during release testing which will
require one more change in libsynthesis. I am working on it as we speak,
eh, write.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.