Re: [SyncEvolution] Correct incantation for sqlite backend
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 12:58 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
On 09/04/2014 10:11:09, "Patrick Ohly"
<patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 07:31 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
>> On 09/04/2014 08:30:42, "Patrick Ohly" <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 19:46 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
>> > Currently inactive::
>> > XMLRPC interface = xmlrpc
>> > Data exchange is done via an XMLRPC interface on the datastore.
>> >
>> Shame, I had plans for that. Ah well.
>
>You would have to compile from source to use it. I could enable it in
>syncevolution.org builds, but I am not certain how useful it would be.
I had future plans to use that via a thin proxy to access the likes of
ToodleDo and Trello. I'll just fiddle with the files instead.
Sounds like the implementation of a backend for these services would be
the better approach. If the choice of C++ as implementation language for
backends is a problem, then let's address that separately.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.