On Mi, 2011-12-14 at 13:27 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Patrick Ohly
> On Mo, 2011-12-05 at 12:12 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> I plan to do this work in 3 steps:
>> 1) The first step, which I've started, is to decouple the session and
>> server from each other and also modify objects that require both the
>> session and server objects as needed. Once this is done the server
>> should function as it does now and all tests should pass in order to
>> move on to step 2.
>> 2) Move session into separate binary using a one-to-one dbus
>> connection for communicating between the 2 processes. At this stage
>> only one session is run at a time and all tests should pass as before.
> I hate to interrupt your ongoing work, but can we reverse the steps so
> that we first introduce the helper executable and a way to start it,
> including the direct D-Bus communication with it?
Ok, I'm looking into this. The original plan was that Step 1 was a
dependency of Step 2 but I've been reconsidering my approach. I'll
look into what you're asking and get back to you soon.
I can also do that part myself, if you give me some pointers to relevant
technical documentation. I was looking for information on bootstrapping
a D-Bus connection over a pair of connected file descriptors, without
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.