On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 11:33 +0100, Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
2012/3/16 Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>:
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 13:52 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Krzesimir, you can document and rename the callbacks in parallel. Please
> base it on the concurrent-sync-pohly-delayed-dbus branch.
It is in
I also started refactoring Resources to have:
- clean ownership situation when creating resources,
- resources tracking in signals
- additional callback for case when creating resource failed after
spawning a sync-helper.
The branch is
but I recommend not merging that, because I have to investigate why
some session test are now failing.
I was also thinking that we should use boost::slot instead of
boost::function for callback for tracking purposes. But if that is
needed then it may be done after I am done with the things above.
Thanks for the changes. I'll have a look at them as part of my own code
changes. Don't worry about the failing tests for now. The problem might
resolve itself as part of the work that I am doing.
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.