Re: [SyncEvolution] DBus server rework: sync, shutdown, and password request
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 09:04 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 03:35 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
> Yeah, unfortunately things are not ideal. Have you given any further
> thought as to how we are going to properly detect conflicting sync
> sessions? This points getting close that this is going to need to be
> dealt with. I've not looked into this at length yet. Is there no
> interface I could use to test that syncs will not conflict?
Nevertheless, it would be nice to punt this to a later patch/branch,
just so we have some chance to get the current work into master.
I agree. Let's keep the current behavior (only one session can run at a
time) and figure out how to detect non-conflicting sessions later. Don't
bite off more than you can swallow :-)
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.