On 08/06/2013 09:57 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Hmm, okay. It just seems preposterous for a simple app to provide a
"google-contacts.service" or "google-carddav.service". This is not
Highlander where there can be only one (app using such a service). A
"google-syncevolution.service" would make more sense taking that into
account, but leads to a worse user experience.
Yes, I recommend namespacing the .service file with your application
name, to avoid conflicts.
But I need to point out something that I already told Ken: I
much time for this (business travel this week, vacation starting next
week). I can justify working on gSSO and Tizen integration, but for
everything else I depend on other developers providing patches.
Sure, that's understood. We already benefit a lot from the work you are
doing on gSSO, we'll mostly reuse that and contribute patches for the