Re: [SyncEvolution] [os-libsynthesis] super data store: trying to read to check for existance
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 15:46 +0200, Lukas Zeller wrote:
But if the superdatastore was changed from probing with ReadItem to
directly probing/deleting with DeleteItem, the error reporting would
look similar, as it would show failed deletes for those subdatastores
not containing the object in question.
No, because I never consider attempts to delete a non-existent item as
an error and thus would always suppress the error message. After all,
the desired outcome was achieved.
This is different for reading where not getting the item data may or may
not be relevant.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.