Re: [SyncEvolution] syncevo-dbus-server + forking processes
On So, 2012-01-15 at 12:09 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Patrick Ohly
<patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
> On Mi, 2012-01-11 at 14:59 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> This will very much be an issue with GIO GDBus as it uses the same
>> mechanism. Looking that the souce of libdbus and gdbus leads me to
>> believe using signals on a non-bus connection doesn't really make
>> sense. I just use method calls in this case.
>
> Indeed, registering signal subscribers isn't very useful when there is
> always exactly one recipient.
>
I've got SignalWatch activation working with one-to-one connections.
Just have to forgo adding the match rule.
Is that also going to be possible with GDBus GIO? If not, then we will
have a problem once code depends on signals and we want to switch to
GDBus GIO.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.