Re: [SyncEvolution] Alarms in the calendar: Evolution vs. vcal

-----Original Message----- From: Tino Keitel [mailto:tino.keitel+syncevolution@tikei.de] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:37 AM To: Zhu, Yongsheng Cc: Ohly, Patrick; syncevolution(a)syncevolution.org Subject: Re: [SyncEvolution] Alarms in the calendar: Evolution vs. vcal On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:12:27 +0800, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote: > > > with the DESCRIPTION set to the > > > SUMMARY of the VEVENT. > It's a good suggestion. I find evolution also implement it in this way. > > That is a potential gap in SyncEvolution: it doesn't have "alarm > > descriptions" and thus creates/stores slightly invalid iCalendar 2.0 > > VALARMs without the obligatory DESCRIPTION. > So if 'SUMMARY' is present and 'DESCRIPTION' of 'VALARM' is absent, > Is it ok to do the assignment? > > No alarm. Yongsheng, can you investigate further? > Ok, I'll do it. Hi, I just built the mb10458 branch and alarms are now preserved in both directions. An appointment created on the phone has a proper alarm set in Evolution, and an appointment created in Evolution has a proper alarm set on the phone. Thanks a bunch. Btw., how can I make --daemon=no the default behaviour? Regards, Tino