Re: [SyncEvolution] Nokia N85 sync status
On Fr, 2010-02-19 at 12:47 +0000, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I can imagine that including stores which have not been alerted yet
might be useful, in case that the client sends an <Alert> for one store
first and later for another one, but sending all stores with the same
URI as above doesn't make sense to me.
Attached is a patch which might do the job of suppressing sub-datastores
in the DevInf. Untested, because I cannot reproduce the situation here.
Jussi, can you apply it and check whether the "right thing" (= one
datastore for "calendar+todo") is sent?
Does it have any effect on the remaining problem with calendar updates
on the device?
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
Attachments:
- no-substores.patch (text/x-patch — 1.6 KB)