On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 12:24 +0200, tino wrote:
> ------- Original message -------
> > From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>
> > To: tino.keitel+syncevolution(a)tikei.de
> > Cc: syncevolution(a)syncevolution.org
> > Sent: 7.8.'12, 9:07
> > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 21:18 +0200, tino.keitel+syncevolution(a)tikei.de
> > wrote:
> >> what is the state of 22.214.171.124? I looks like there are quite some
> >> interesting bugs since the syncevolution-1-2-99-3 git tag.
> > True. I probably should just go ahead and tag+compile 126.96.36.199. Or
> > perhaps go for 1.3 directly?
> > What do you and users think? Does 1.3 need more time for testing or
> > should I just go ahead and pull the trigger?
> maybe it is a good idea to release 188.8.131.52 and rename it to 1.3 if nothing
> serious pops up for a few days.
I tagged 184.108.40.206 this morning, a sanity build + test run is on-going.
It completed yesterday evening. I have too many tests ;-)
I sent out official announcements today, too.
One more problem was reported in the meantime, but it seems that it is
not relevant with KDE as in Debian Testing:
"syncevolution fails for users without an active (kde) session"
So your version of KDE does not work without D-Bus. I had tried that
here (Debian testing, KDE 4.8.4) without problems.
I'll add a check that D-Bus works before calling KDE code. That should fix
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.