On Fr, 2011-01-21 at 17:23 +0000, Giuseppe Gerace wrote: > For the moment, I'm interesting in detecting output. If I'm not wrong, > your last file "test_syncevo-http-server.py" included either the http > server or the syncevo-dbus-server. I can also modify > "syncevo-dbus-server.cpp", but then how I can integrate it with your > test_syncevo-http-server file? When you modify syncevo-dbus-server.cpp, you need to recompile SyncEvolution to produce a modified "syncevo-dbus-server" executable. syncevo-http-server communicates with that via D-Bus, so no need to modify the HTTP server script. > I think it's more easy to catch the output, but the first part of a > client's registration don't generate any html log file, if I'm not > wrong. You can confirm my hypothesis? I think that's right. Can you say a bit more about what you are trying to achieve? If this is about a one-off thing, like getting your own device working, then the manual approach should be way easier. If this is about supporting multiple devices automatically, then it would make a lot more sense to put it into SyncEvolution properly. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.