On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Pequet wrote:
Le 10/06/2013 16:48, Patrick Ohly a écrit :
> Hello Thomas!
Hello Patrick !
>
> One of your user reported that the SyncEvolution<->Memotoo
> combination
> started failing for him more often since April. Have you changed
> anything in the SyncML implementation of Memotoo?
May be but I have no users that tell me problem with SyncEvolution
Here's the bug report:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65477
> The Synthesis engine in the client complains about a Sync
command
> which
> comes too late:
>
> [2013-06-09 18:38:07.564] 'processCmd' - Processing incoming
> command,
> Cmd=Sync, IncomingMsgID=4, CmdID=2 [--][++] [->end] [->enclosing]
>
> [2013-06-09 18:38:07.565] Created command 'Status' (outgoing)
> [2013-06-09 18:38:07.565] Processing Sync, Source='note',
> Target='./memo'
> [2013-06-09 18:38:07.565] Sync command not allowed outside of
> sync phase (-> 403)
> –
> [2013-06-09 18:38:07.565] 'SessionAbort' - Aborting Session,
> Status=400, ProblemSource=LOCAL [--][++] [->end] [->enclosing]
> [2013-06-09 18:38:07.565] WARNING: Aborting Session with Reason
> Status 400 (LOCAL problem) ***
>
> The log that I got didn't include message dumps, but I suspect that
> the
> engine was right - that part hasn't changed for a long time.
Can you send me logs to understand what happen ?
Daniel, may I share your log file with Thomas?
It might be more helpful to reproduce the problem while the log level
includes message dumps. Can you do
syncevolution --configure loglevel=3 memotoo
and then try syncing until the problem happens again?
Then archive the entire content of the session directory and send it to
Thomas and myself.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.