On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Chris Kühl <blixtra(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2011/11/17 Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>:
> On Mi, 2011-11-16 at 15:40 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> > The same binary runs on Debian Testing, albeit with regressions in
>> > TestSessionAPIsReal.testSync and
>> > TestSessionAPIsReal.testSyncSecondSession :
>> These were failing for me using master on my fedora 15 system so
>> haven't been properly debugged in gio-gdbus.
> It turned that the 101 status in these failures is a remote error sent
> by the plan44.ch SyncML server, which is the server that these real
> syncs are meant to be done with. I've switched to Memotoo as peer for
> the D-Bus tests for now.
> Lukas, any idea about the reason for the 101 error? I don't see any log
> created for this session on the server. The error occurs right at the
> start, as the status returned for the initial SyncHdr.
Ok, thanks for the update and glad to see that's working. I'm still
trying to work out what's going on with Ubuntu Lucid. I'm getting the
same result with Debian Stable as well, though. ...back to bug fixing.
I've pushed a commit to the gio-gdbus branch that gets the server
starting up fine. Seems to have been a compiler bug. However, I'm
currently getting the following error when running each test.
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible
causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the
message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout
expired, or the network connection was broken.
Tracking this down now.