On Di, 2011-01-25 at 15:56 +0000, Giancarlo wrote: That's good news, thanks for sharing. Good that had the time to reply ;-} Typically I try to treat all questions with the same amount of attention, but when I am busy there may be delays. In that case it does help to explain a bit why questions are asked and introduce yourself, because projects working with SyncEvolution definitely deserve a bit of extra care. I never tried it, but with the file backend that should indeed be very easy and efficient to do. Just archive the whole directory and restore individual files as needed. Restoring also the original time stamp would be better than setting the current time, because then clients which still have that restored item do not need to pull it again, but this is a minor optimization. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.

On Di, 2011-01-25 at 15:56 +0000, Giancarlo wrote: There doesn't seem to be anything available there yet. Please ping me again once you would like http://syncevolution.org/about/related-projects to link to that project page. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.